HR Tool
Team Performance & Feedback
A feedback and evaluation platform that helps teams measure performance, collaboration, and engagement — with peer reviews, anonymous sentiment surveys, and skill comparison tools.
About the project
It is a feedback and evaluation tool that helps teams measure performance and collaboration. It enables structured peer reviews across key metrics such as work quality, expertise, communication, and teamwork, while also collecting anonymous sentiment feedback through short surveys. The platform provides clear insights into strengths, growth areas, and overall team health.
Challenges
- Making peer feedback feel safe, clear, and easy to use without intimidating users
- Visualizing performance and sentiment data effectively for different audiences
- Balancing anonymity with meaningful transparency in reporting
- Creating a scalable and intuitive UX that works for small teams and enterprise
- Aligning product goals with user trust and long-term engagement
My role
- Defined design requirements and product UX strategy from scratch
- Designed user flows, wireframes, and high-fidelity UI across all features
- Conducted UX research and usability validation sessions
- Built and maintained a scalable design system
- Collaborated closely with product and engineering throughout development
Sentiment & Satisfaction Surveys
Short, anonymous NPS-style surveys measuring how happy team members are to work with each other. The 1–10 scale is intuitive, non-threatening, and produces quantifiable data over time. Open comment fields allow qualitative context without exposing identity.
The survey dashboard gives managers a real-time view of team sentiment, tracks results across reporting periods, and surfaces early signals that need attention — all without naming individuals.
Structured Review Cycles
Structured review flows allowing team members to evaluate colleagues across multiple dimensions: Quantity of work, Quality of work, Functional expertise, Communication, Teamwork and attitude, Initiative and ownership, Leadership and mentorship, and English.
Each dimension uses a clear four-level scale — Needs development, Successful, Exceeds, Can't evaluate — helping reviewers give meaningful, calibrated feedback quickly. The scheduler lets admins set evaluation windows and auto-remind participants, reducing friction in running regular review cycles.
Results
By implementing structured, bite-sized peer reviews, we reduced the time spent on evaluations by 40%. Participation rates jumped from 53% to 85%, ensuring a more holistic view of employee performance.